MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2931398364 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2019.2909431

A Reconfigurable DLL-Based Digital-to-Time Converter Using Charge Pump Current Interpolation and Digital Predistortion Linearization

2019· article· en· W2931398364 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Elian, Ibrahim M. Elfadel, Ayman Shabra

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSemiconductor Research Corporation
KeywordsDifferential nonlinearityPredistortionJitterIntegral nonlinearityElectronic engineeringComputer scienceLinearizationDigital-to-analog converterInterpolation (computer graphics)CMOSControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringPhysicsNonlinear systemVoltageEngineeringTelecommunicationsConvertersAmplifierFrame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief presents a digital-to-time converter (DTC) based on a reconfigurable delay-locked loop that employs dual feedback taps and interpolation at the output of two charge pumps biased with programmable complementary currents from a current digital-to-analog converter (I-DAC) to achieve fine delay tuning. Through selection of the feedback and output delay line taps, the 65-nm CMOS prototype can be configured to achieve different specs, such as a 24.5 ps delay span with a 0.46 ps maximum delay step and 1.33 ps maximum RMS jitter or a span of 244 ps with a 3.30 ps maximum step and 2.63 ps maximum RMS jitter when a 7-bit I-DAC and a 2 GHz input are used. A simple digital predistortion method to compensate for the inherent nonlinearity of the architecture is presented and experimentally shown to improve the worst-case integral nonlinearity from -14.3 LSB (-27.6 ps) to +1.79 LSB (+3.43 ps) for the 244 ps delay span case, and by 67%-88% at all taps for the same loop configuration. Excluding the I-DAC, which would require an estimated 0.2 mW, the DTC consumes 0.665 mW from a 1.25-V supply at 2 GHz and occupies an area of 46 μm × 28 μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207