From Bali to Copenhagen: Towards a Shared Vision for a Post-2012 Climate Regime?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
breakthrough . . ..‖ 2 But for many others the outcome spells failure, both in the world's fight against climate change and in the UN climate change regime.3 Climate change may well be the single most important public policy challenge of our time.4 It is planetary in scope and intergenerational in its implications.Even more importantly, because climate change implicates virtually all production and consumption processes, addressing it is about nothing less than changing the way we do everything that we do everywhere in the world.Climate change, then, is also a classic collective action problem.It can be solved only if all states, or at least the major greenhouse gas emitters, cooperate.In addition, climate change raises a series of difficult questions of equity and, some say, global environmental justice.5 Historically, emissions of greenhouse gases have been far greater in the industrialized world.The emissions of industrialized countries still significantly exceed those of developing countries, 6 although the emissions of some large developing countries are projected to rise sharply over the next two decades.7 In 2006, China surpassed the United States as the largest national emitter of greenhouse gases.8 President Barack Obama, Remarks by the President During Press Availability inCopenhagen (Dec.18,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.027 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Research integrity | 0.023 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".