MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932058420 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz049

Guideline attainment and morbidity/mortality rates in a large cohort of European haemodialysis patients (EURODOPPS)

2019· article· en· W2932058420 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sophie Liabeuf, Ayesha Sajjad, Anneke Kramer, Brian Bieber, Keith McCullough, R. Pisoni, Fergus Caskey, Christian Combe, Bruce Robinson, Kitty J. Jager, Ziad A. Massy

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRelypsaFresenius Medical Care North AmericaKyowa Hakko KirinEuropean Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant AssociationKidney Foundation of CanadaSanofiAmgen
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineHazard ratioCohortDialysisProportional hazards modelInternal medicineCohort studyConfidence intervalPediatricsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis patients experience a wide variety of intermediate complications, such as anaemia, hypertension and mineral bone disease (MBD). We aimed to assess the risk of death and hospital admissions as a function of the simultaneous attainment of different guideline targets (for hypertension, anaemia and MBD) in a large European cohort of dialysis patients. METHODS: EURODOPPS is part of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) international, prospective cohort study of adult, in-centre haemodialysis patients for whom clinical data are extracted from medical records. In the present analysis, 6317 patients from seven European countries were included between 2009 and 2011. The percentages of patients treated according to the international guidelines on anaemia, hypertension and MBD were determined. The overall degree of guideline attainment was considered to be high if four or all five of the evaluated targets were attained, moderate if two or three targets were attained, and low if fewer than two targets were attained. Fully adjusted multivariate Cox models were used to investigate the relationship of target attainment with mortality and first hospital admission. RESULTS: At baseline, the degree of target attainment was low in 1751 patients (28%), moderate in 3803 (60%) and high in 763 (12%). In the fully adjusted model using time-dependent covariates, low attainment was associated with higher all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.19 (1.05-1.34)] and high attainment was associated with lower all-cause mortality [0.82 (0.68-0.99)]. In a similar model that additionally accounted for death as a competing risk, low and high attainments were not associated with hospital admission. CONCLUSION: In a large international cohort of dialysis patients, we have shown that more stringent application of guidelines is associated with lower mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207