MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932705805 · doi:10.1093/jme/tjz042

Molecular Phylogeny of Dermacentor parumapertus (Acari: Ixodidae) from Two Locations Within Its Geographical Range

2019· article· en· W2932705805 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Santos Portugal, Michelle Allerdice, Gail Miriam Moraru, Jonas G. King, Christopher D. Paddock, Tom Becker, Travis C. Smith, Jerome Goddard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Entomology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight Center
KeywordsIxodidaeAcariBiologyDermacentorRange (aeronautics)ZoologyParasitiformesPhylogeneticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dermacentor parumapertus Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) is a rather obscure tick found on jackrabbits in the western United States and parts of Canada and Mexico. Specimens from the northern part of their range are consistently different morphologically from ones found in southern and eastern parts of their range (particularly west Texas), leading some researchers to declare the southern form a variety or subspecies. This study examined field-collected adult D. parumapertus from two main locations-Utah and Texas-within its geographic distribution to ascertain the degree of genetic divergence in the two populations based upon both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. In total, 30 D. parumapertus were analyzed by PCR using both mtDNA and nDNA genes, and one D. nitens was included for comparison. Trees were constructed for all mtDNA genes individually, as well as after concatenating mtDNA (COI, COII, 12S) and nDNA (2 ITS2 primers), respectively. All constructed trees were exported to FigTree v1.4.3 and TreeGraph v2.14.1-771 beta for visualization. The majority of the Utah and Texas populations of D. parumapertus separated molecularly in both mtDNA and nDNA trees; however, analysis with mtDNA genes showed that 3/13 (23%) of Utah tick specimens were removed molecularly from other specimens collected at the same location. Thus, there was not enough evidence to declare these two disparate and morphologically different populations as distinct and separate species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical EntomologySame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207