MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932835084 · doi:10.32725/jab.2005.021

Endoplasmic reticulum quality control and congenital pathology

2005· article· en· W2932835084 on OpenAlexafffund
Marek Michalak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Biomedicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCalreticulinCalnexinEndoplasmic reticulumCell biologyBiologyUnfolded protein response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quality control of the endoplasmic reticulum plays a critical role in protein folding, modification and modification of a secretory pathway. As endoplasmic reticulum chaperones, calreticulin and calnexin have similar substrate specificity and share several common features. Yet, surprisingly, mice bearing a disruption in the calreticulin gene die from a lesion in cardiac development and develop significant metabolic problems whereas calnexin-deficient mice are born alive with, yet not understood, neurological problems. Studies with calreticulin and calnexin gene knockout mice and calreticulin- and calnexin-deficient cell lines indicate that calnexin is unable to compensate for the loss of calreticulin and conversely, calreticulin cannot compensate for the loss of calnexin. Calreticulin or calnexin deficiency or reduction in the level of ERp57 protein (ERp57 heterozygote mice) leads to development of metabolic disorders as documented by sever changes serum lipids and carbohydrates composition in these animals. These observations indicate that calreticulin, calnexin and ERp57, in addition of being involved in maturation of glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, perform other distinct functions including affecting energy metabolism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied BiomedicineSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207