Compact self‐isolated MIMO antenna system based on quarter‐mode SIW cavity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A compact self‐isolated multiple‐input–multiple‐output (MIMO) antenna system is proposed. It is based on a quarter‐mode substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) cavity where two edges are shorted by metallic vias and the other edges are open. A narrow slot with a rotated angle of 45° is utilised to divide the single cavity into two equal eighth‐mode sub‐cavities. These sub‐cavities are fed by two coaxial ports to construct the proposed MIMO antenna system. A self‐isolated mechanism that cavity energy inputted by one port is radiated into free space rather than transmitted to the other port is first observed. High isolation between two antenna elements can be obtained without additional isolating or decoupling networks although they are contacted with each other. A fabricated prototype operating at 3.5 GHz achieves the measured port isolation of higher than 18.5 dB, envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) of less than 0.04, the peak gain of 4.6 dBi, and maximum efficiency of 79.2%. With advantages of compact size, high isolation, low ECC, and good radiation performance, the proposed self‐isolated MIMO antenna system is a good candidate for wireless communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".