Importancia del comercio de México con EU y Canadá a partir del programa CAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMENLa primera parte del artículo cuestiona qué es la integración; las condiciones para que ésta se dé y si existe un solo tipo de integración. La segunda parte muestra la importancia que tiene la economía canadiense para el comercio exterior de México; dentro de las relaciones comerciales entre México y Canadá. La tercera parte considera el análisis del comercio de México con Estados Unidos. A partir del programa estadístico CAN se evalúa el comercio entre los tres países participantes.Palabras clave: CAN, comercio, integración, América del Norte. The importance of Mexico’s trade with the U.S. and Canada from CAN program.ABSTRACTThe first part of the paper asks which is the integration, what are the conditions under which it occurs, and if there is only a one type of integration. The second part shows importance of the Canadian economy in foreign trade Mexico, and in trade relations between Mexico and Canada. The third section reviews the trade between Mexico - United States. The fourth section evaluates the trade between the three economies through the CAN program.Keywords: CAN, trade, integration, North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".