Importancia del comercio de México con EU y Canadá a partir del programa CAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMENLa primera parte del artículo cuestiona qué es la integración; las condiciones para que ésta se dé y si existe un solo tipo de integración. La segunda parte muestra la importancia que tiene la economía canadiense para el comercio exterior de México; dentro de las relaciones comerciales entre México y Canadá. La tercera parte considera el análisis del comercio de México con Estados Unidos. A partir del programa estadístico CAN se evalúa el comercio entre los tres países participantes.Palabras clave: CAN, comercio, integración, América del Norte. The importance of Mexico’s trade with the U.S. and Canada from CAN program.ABSTRACTThe first part of the paper asks which is the integration, what are the conditions under which it occurs, and if there is only a one type of integration. The second part shows importance of the Canadian economy in foreign trade Mexico, and in trade relations between Mexico and Canada. The third section reviews the trade between Mexico - United States. The fourth section evaluates the trade between the three economies through the CAN program.Keywords: CAN, trade, integration, North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".