MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2933704068 · doi:10.1111/bjd.17941

Health‐related quality of life and economic implications of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma

2019· article· en· W2933704068 on OpenAlex
Yevgeniy R. Semenov, Abby R. Rosenberg, C. Herbosa, Neha Mehta–Shah, Amy Musiek

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Quality-adjusted life yearPopulationHealth Utilities IndexSF-36GerontologyDemographyPhysical therapyHealth related quality of lifeCost effectivenessInternal medicineEnvironmental healthDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) has been associated with considerable physical, psychological and financial burden. However, its impact on health-related quality of life (QoL) and economic costs are not well studied. OBJECTIVES: To measure the QoL impact and financial burden of CTCL. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 67 patients with CTCL was conducted using the Ontario Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) questionnaire. Normative population data (n = 3310) were obtained from the 2002-2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health. Economic cost was estimated using quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) loss derived from HUI3 scores. RESULTS: Patients with CTCL had significantly lower aggregate HUI3 scores than the general population (0·68 vs. 0·87, P < 0·001). Multivariable regression analysis adjusting for demographics and comorbidities showed CTCL was associated with significantly poorer performance overall (-0·13, 95% CI -0·21 to -0·06, P < 0·001) and in domains of speech (-0·03, 95% CI -0·05 to -0·01, P = 0·01), ambulation (-0·04, 95% CI -0·08 to 0·00, P = 0·03), emotion (-0·07, 95% CI -0·12 to -0·02, P = 0·01), and pain (-0·07, 95% CI -0·13 to -0·01, P = 0·03). These health utility decrements yielded an average loss of 1·48 QALYs per patient. Using a $50 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, CTCL was associated with an individual lifetime burden of $73 889 and U.S. societal burden of $2·86 billion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest CTCL has a pervasive impact on QoL, comparable with debilitating conditions such as end-stage renal disease. The substantial economic burden of CTCL underscores the potential societal benefit of prompt diagnosis and effective management. What's already known about this topic? Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is associated with physical, psychological and financial burden. What does this study add? The overall quality-of-life impact of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma has not previously been measured using a generic health utility instrument. In this study, we compare the overall quality-of-life burden of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with that of other populations and calculate the economic burden of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it