Health‐related quality of life and economic implications of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) has been associated with considerable physical, psychological and financial burden. However, its impact on health-related quality of life (QoL) and economic costs are not well studied. OBJECTIVES: To measure the QoL impact and financial burden of CTCL. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 67 patients with CTCL was conducted using the Ontario Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) questionnaire. Normative population data (n = 3310) were obtained from the 2002-2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health. Economic cost was estimated using quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) loss derived from HUI3 scores. RESULTS: Patients with CTCL had significantly lower aggregate HUI3 scores than the general population (0·68 vs. 0·87, P < 0·001). Multivariable regression analysis adjusting for demographics and comorbidities showed CTCL was associated with significantly poorer performance overall (-0·13, 95% CI -0·21 to -0·06, P < 0·001) and in domains of speech (-0·03, 95% CI -0·05 to -0·01, P = 0·01), ambulation (-0·04, 95% CI -0·08 to 0·00, P = 0·03), emotion (-0·07, 95% CI -0·12 to -0·02, P = 0·01), and pain (-0·07, 95% CI -0·13 to -0·01, P = 0·03). These health utility decrements yielded an average loss of 1·48 QALYs per patient. Using a $50 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, CTCL was associated with an individual lifetime burden of $73 889 and U.S. societal burden of $2·86 billion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest CTCL has a pervasive impact on QoL, comparable with debilitating conditions such as end-stage renal disease. The substantial economic burden of CTCL underscores the potential societal benefit of prompt diagnosis and effective management. What's already known about this topic? Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is associated with physical, psychological and financial burden. What does this study add? The overall quality-of-life impact of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma has not previously been measured using a generic health utility instrument. In this study, we compare the overall quality-of-life burden of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with that of other populations and calculate the economic burden of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".