MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2933763494 · doi:10.1113/ep087536

The influence of acute hyperglycaemia on brachial artery flow‐mediated dilatation in the early and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle

2019· article· en· W2933763494 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer S. Williams, Taylor V. Stimpson, Joshua C. Tremblay, Alyssa M. Fenuta, Kyra E. Pyke

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsResponse Biomedical (Canada)Queen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBrachial arteryMedicineInternal medicineFollicular phaseMenstrual cycleEndocrinologyEndothelial dysfunctionIngestionHormoneBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of the study? This is the first study to examine the impact of acute hyperglycaemia on endothelial function [flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD)] in premenopausal women across the early and late follicular (EF and LF) phases of the menstrual cycle. What is the main finding and its importance? Flow‐mediated dilatation was impaired 90 min after glucose ingestion, with no significant difference between phases. This indicates that women are susceptible to acute hyperglycaemia‐induced endothelial dysfunction in both the EF and LF phases of the menstrual cycle, despite potentially vasoprotective elevations in estradiol levels during the LF phase. Abstract Acute hyperglycaemia transiently impairs endothelial function in healthy men when assessed via flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD). However, research in female participants is lacking, and the impact of menstrual phase [early follicular (EF) and late follicular (LF)] on vulnerability to acute hyperglycaemia‐induced endothelial dysfunction is unknown. Seventeen healthy, naturally menstruating women [21 ± 1 years old (mean ± SD)] participated in three visits. During two visits (EF Glucose and LF Glucose ), brachial artery FMD was assessed before and 60, 90 and 120 min after an oral glucose challenge (75 g glucose). During an additional EF visit, participants ingested 300 ml of water (EF TimeControl ). Blood glucose and insulin increased 30 min after glucose ingestion ( P < 0.001), with no difference between phases. Flow‐mediated dilatation did not change in EF TimeControl ( P = 0.748) but was reduced 90 min after glucose ingestion (Pre, 8.5 ± 2.5%; Post90, 6.6 ± 2.4%, P = 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.82), with no difference between phases (main effect of phase, P = 0.506; phase by time interaction, P = 0.391). To account for individual variability in the time course of the impact of hyperglycaemia, the maximal hyperglycaemia‐induced impairment in FMD was determined in each participant and compared between phases, revealing no significant phase differences (EF Glucose , −3.1 ± 2.8%; LF Glucose , −2.4 ± 2.1%, P = 0.181; d = 0.34). These results indicate that, similar to findings in men, acute hyperglycaemia results in FMD impairment in young women. We did not detect significant protection from acute hyperglycaemia‐induced endothelial dysfunction in the LF ‘high‐oestrogen’ phase in this sample, and further research is needed to examine the potential for a protective effect of oestrogen exposure, including oral contraceptive pills and hormone replacement therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207