MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2933878669 · doi:10.1093/ahr/rhz158

J<scp>oy</scp> S<scp>chulz</scp>. <i>Hawaiian by Birth: Missionary Children, Bicultural Identity, and U.S. Colonialism in the Pacific</i>.

2019· article· en· W2933878669 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Barman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismIdentity (music)Pacific islandersHistoryChristianityGenealogyGender studiesAnthropologyAncient historySociologyEthnic groupArchaeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two centuries ago, the newly formed American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) dispatched seven men, “almost all college and seminary graduates,” along with their wives and children, on a half-year journey around South America to the middle of the Pacific Ocean; their purpose was to convert native Hawaiian Islanders to Christianity. Having “[given] away their earthly possessions in order to qualify for Christian missionary service,” there was no turning back, either for them or for another 140 or so missionaries following after them over the next three decades (17). Joy Schulz’s Hawaiian by Birth: Missionary Children, Bicultural Identity, and U.S. Colonialism in the Pacific focuses not on this purposeful first generation but rather on their children’s searches for belonging. In doing so, the author insightfully draws on their writings collected together by the Hawaiian Mission Children’s Society (HMCS), founded by offspring in Honolulu in 1853 so as “to carve an identity from the larger Hawaiian society” (136).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207