MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2934214589 · doi:10.11159/icsect19.149

Synthesis and Characterization of Cement/Carbon-Nanotube Composite for Structural Health Monitoring Applications

2019· article· en· W2934214589 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diego Leon Castañeda Saldarriaga, Julián Sierra-Pérez, Joham Alvarez-Montoya

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeCharacterization (materials science)Composite numberCementMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The civil structures during their useful life are subjected to different loads (environmental and mechanical), that cause progressively deterioration and that consequently requires maintenance efforts to keep them safe and operative. In this work, a novel alternative is proposed based in the development of a smart material with multifunctional characteristics that allow the Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)without requiring external sensors. This was possible by developing cement matrix compounds with the addition of carbon nanotubes. The manufacturing of this material began with an experimental design (DOE) that allowed to determine the mixturestype with which the sensor was manufactured, additionally repeatability and reproducibility was guaranteed. To measure the piezoresistive behavior of the samples, we used an INSTRON 5582 universal testing machine, a data acquisition equipment to obtain the variation in voltage and Micron Optics SM130 optical sensing interrogator for measuring deformations. Once the rheological and mechanical behavior of the material were characterized, mechanical tests of the material were carried out without exceeding the maximum deformations of the material in order to acquire data on the resistive behavior of the structure and find the gauge factor. The results of this development offer a part of the solution to the growing needs in the field of civil engineering against the early warning of damages caused by both natural phenomena and human causes (use of inappropriate materials, wrong calculations, overloads).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207