MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The peculiarities of integration of scientific and educational activity in universities of Canada

2018· article· en· W2934540811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific papers of Berdiansk State Pedagogical University Series Pedagogical sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUkraine: War, Education, Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCompetence (human resources)Engineering ethicsPedagogyPsychologyPolitical scienceSociologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the problem of the scientific research competence formation of students at the universities of Canada. Educational research competence is the basis for the formation of professional competence. The modern higher education of Ukraine should focus on the training of competitive graduates who can independently develop career and demonstrate great achievements in the professional activity. Under the conditions of transition to new standards of training, it requires the formation of research competence of students in the process of their studies at the university. In particular, the experience of the leading countries of the world, such as Canada, evidences that an effective way of attracting students to research and developing their research competence is to integrate academic and research activities. This approach can be realized only under the conditions of the introduction of research training technology, which is widely experienced at the universities of Canada. Effective functioning of this technology is possible only in research universities, where teachers work with students together while studying the methodology of conducting research. It stimulates the motivation for scientific activity, contributes to the development of critical thinking, and self-reflection. The main components of research studying are lessons, research and monitoring. Pedagogical conditions of the functioning of the technology include the introduction of non-typical methods of scientific research, interdisciplinary approach, the transformation of the content component of the curriculum, based on the results of relevant modern research. The system of integration of scientific and educational activities is provided through three stages of the educational process: studying the methodology of conducting research in the specialty and working with the scientific literature; independent information searching with the compilation of a research plan, hypothesis and modeling of further activities; self-supporting research realization. Key words: scientific activity, research studying, research competence, interdisciplinary approach, reflection approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.019
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific papers of Berdiansk State Pedagogical University Series Pedagogical sciencesSame topicUkraine: War, Education, HealthFrench-language works237,207