MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2934978421 · doi:10.1289/isee.2016.3486

A Natural Experiment: Closure of an Oil Refinery & Influence on Local Hospitalizations

2016· article· en· W2934978421 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hwashin Shin, Wesley S. Burr, Robert Dales, Marc Smith‐Doiron, Branka Jovic, Lisa Marie Kauri, Ling Liu, Dave Stieb

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefineryOil refineryEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionPopulationEnvironmental healthClosure (psychology)PollutionEnvironmental engineeringMedicineWaste managementEngineeringBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Under the Clean Air Regulatory Agenda, Health Canada is mandated to study the effect of air pollution from various industrial sources on Canadian population health. An oil refinery in Oakville, Ontario was closed in 2004-05, providing an opportunity for a natural experiment to study the effects of changes in oil refinery-related air pollution on human health. METHODS: To evaluate the impact of the oil refinery closure, we compared air pollution levels and cause-specific hospitalizations and mortality counts before/after the refinery closure (based on a balanced two-period design). The refinery was located between two cities, Oakville and Burlington, which were considered the primary areas. The surrounding cities (the greater Toronto area and Hamilton) were used as a reference population. We examined wind speed and direction to be able to demonstrate reduction in air pollution. RESULTS: About 6,000 tonnes of sulphur dioxide (SO2) were emitted annually by the refinery. Following the refinery closure, ambient SO2 concentrations dropped on average 13% in Oakville and 21% in Burlington. Strong associations (p < 0.01) were observed between daily concentrations of SO2 and hospitalizations, and Oakville cold-season age-standardized respiratory hospitalization rates showed a significant step-function reduction of 2.3 counts-per-thousand-persons-per-year at the time of the closure (p < 0.001). Reductions in hospitalizations in Burlington and other surrounding municipalities were not tied to the closure of the refinery. CONCLUSION: The refinery closure was associated with an immediate and measurable reduction in ambient SO2 concentration and cold-season respiratory hospitalizations for Oakville, a result which was not duplicated in any of the socioeconomically similar reference populations. This natural experiment provides evidence on the association between refinery emissions and adverse health effects and demonstrates the health benefits of reduced exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207