← Back to cohort
Monte Carlo studies for the optimisation of the Cherenkov Telescope Array layout
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueAstroparticle Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesHorizon 2020Argonne National LaboratoryComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronCanadian Space AgencyIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e ComunicaçõesState Committee of ScienceUniversitetet i OsloMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la RechercheMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyRegione LombardiaNarodowe Centrum NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFondazione CariploBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftLeverhulme TrustEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNational Research FoundationJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUniversity of New South WalesNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Sydney UniversityMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSeventh Framework ProgrammeMinisterio de Educación, Gobierno de ChileSveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u OsijekuIowa State UniversityUniversity of OxfordInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of TokyoUniversity of LeicesterMonash UniversityIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaDurham UniversityVetenskapsrådetSmithsonian InstitutionBarnard CollegeHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostUddannelses- og ForskningsministerietGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAgence Nationale de la RechercheSveučilište u ZagrebuCentro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico IndustrialNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCherenkov Telescope ArrayPhysicsCherenkov radiationObservatoryMonte Carlo methodTelescopeAngular resolution (graph drawing)Gamma-ray astronomyEnergy (signal processing)AstronomyGamma rayAstrophysicsOpticsDetector
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.375
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations69
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno