Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE IDEA FOR THIS BOOK came to me in 2014 when I taught an introductory course to the writings of Johann Gottfried Herder at the University of Toronto. The course was taught in English and examined a number of his major writings, mainly from the early period spanning the two decades from the mid-1760s to the 1780s. This was the time when, in response to a widespread crisis in the formation and formulation of knowledge, he conceived of all the groundbreaking ideas that make up the basis of his radical new approach to the disciplines of philosophy, anthropology, aesthetics, and others. Fortunately, there is an excellent body of Herder's work available in English, which, together with the increasing amount of critical scholarship in English, allows for a rich encounter with his work for those who don't speak or read German. In order to give students a better understanding of how Herder's central ideas had emerged from his philosophical training, however, I wanted them to be able to read his first fully formulated essay, Versuch über das Sein (Essay on Being, 1763–64). This difficult piece provides essential insights into the intellectual platform which launched his life's work. I completed a rough translation, which we used in class; it was a very rudimentary English sketch of the Essay , and I'm grateful to my students for helping me work through some of the problems in that early version. Subsequently I found myself returning to my translation and gradually refining it to the point where I felt it was appropriate to share this text, little known in the English-speaking world, with the academic community. Some texts occupy a decisive moment in the history of ideas or in an individual's philosophical development, yet remain more or less invisible in the larger picture that is the history of philosophy. If texts were the stars in the night sky, these would be the ones whose light pales when compared to the brightest stars: Sirius, Arcturus, Canopus. Yet the fainter stars such as Polaris and Acrux are the ones that provide orientation. In the same way, the less prominent philosophical texts hold a different kind of key to some of the larger secrets of the conceptual constellations of the past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".