A <i>k</i> -mean characteristic function for optimizing short- and long-term-average-ratio-based detection of microseismic events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Event detection is an essential component of microseismic data analysis. This process is typically carried out using a short- and long-term-average-ratio (STA/LTA) method, which is simple and computationally efficient but often yields inconsistent results for noisy data sets. We have aimed to optimize the performance of the STA/LTA method by testing different input forms of 3C waveform data and different characteristic functions (CFs), including a proposed k-mean CF. These tests are evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and are compared based on synthetic and field data examples. Our analysis indicates that the STA/LTA method using a k-mean CF improves the detection sensitivity and yields more robust event detection on noisy data sets than some previous approaches. In addition, microseismic events are detected efficiently on field data examples using the same detection threshold obtained from the ROC analysis on synthetic data examples. We recommend the use of the Youden index based on ROC analysis using a training subset, extracted from the continuous data, to further improve the detection threshold for field microseismic data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".