Gene-methylation interactions: Discovering region-wise DNA methylation levels that modify SNP-associated disease risk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The genetic code is tightly linked to epigenetic instructions as to what genes to express, and when and where to express them. The most studied epigenetic mark is DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides. Today’s technology enables a rapid assessment of DNA sequence and methylation levels at a single-site resolution for hundreds of thousands of sites in the human genome, in thousands of individuals at a time. Recent years have seen a rapid increase in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) searching for the causes of risk for genetic diseases that previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) could not pinpoint. However, those single-omics data analyses led to even more questions and it has become clear that only by integrating data one can get closer to answers. Here, we propose two new methods within genetic association analyses that treat the level of DNA methylation at a given CpG site as environmental exposure. Our analyses search for statistical interactions between a given allele and DNA methylation ( G × Me ), and between a parent-of-origin effect and DNA methylation (PoO× Me). The new methods were implemented in the R package Haplin and were tested on a dataset comprising genotype data from mother-father-child triadsm with DNA methylation data from the children only. The phenotype here was orofacial clefts (OFC), a relatively common birth defect in humans, which is known to have a genetic origin and an environmental component possibly mediated by DNA methylation. We found no significant PoO×Me interactions and a few significant G×Me interactions. Our results show that the significance of these interaction effects depends on the genomic region in which the CpGs reside and on the number of strata of methylation level. We demonstrate that, by including the methylation level around the SNP in the analyses, the estimated relative risk of OFC can change significantly. We also discuss the importance of including control data in such analyses. The new methods will be of value for all the researchers who want to explore genome- and epigenome-wide datasets in an integrative manner. Moreover, thanks to the implementation in a popular R package, the methods are easily accessible and enable fast scans of the genome- and epigenome-wide datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".