Relative Socioeconomic Status of Spouses, Gender Attitudes, and Attributes, and Marital Quality Experienced by Couples in Metropolitan Moscow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we expand the line of research in the United States suggesting marital quality or marital stability experienced by spouses is at risk when the socioeconomic attainments of wives equal or surpass those of their husbands to a different cultural context, metropolitan Moscow. Specifically, we analyze the direct and relative effects of spouses education, employment status, occupational prestige, and income on the marital quality experienced by Russian husbands and wives in 1996. In addition, we test whether gender beliefs and attributes of husbands and/or wives interact with relative socioeconomic statuses in their effects on marital quality. The data for the study were collected through a multi-stage, cluster probability sample in the Moscow metropolitan area and the sampling frame consisted of voter registration lists randomly selected from municipalities that were randomly selected from nine prefectures in Moscow. The working data set is 746 couples. Among dual earner couples, contrary to expectation, wives with occupational status lower than husbands have lower marital quality than wives with occupational status higher than husbands. Wives marital quality is highest when spouses incomes are more similar than different. Both spouses marital quality is positively affected by their own and their partners ability to be sensitive, while wifes instrumentality negatively affects both spouses marital quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".