The crochetage pattern in electrocardiograms of pediatric atrial septal defect patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the sensitivity and specificity of the crochetage pattern (a notch near the apex of the R wave in electrocardiographic inferior limb leads) in the pediatric electrocardiogram for detecting patients with a secundum atrial septal defect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Electrocardiograms from 82 consecutive preoperative pediatric patients with a secundum atrial septal defect confirmed by two-dimensional echocardiography were reviewed for evidence of right ventricular hypertrophy and the crochetage pattern. These electrocardiograms were compared with 244 consecutive preoperative controls consisting of patients with echocardiographically proven patent foramen ovale, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, tetralogy of Fallot and patients with normal echocardiogram studies. RESULTS: The electrocardiographic crochetage pattern was observed in 31.7% of preoperative patients with a secundum atrial septal defect in at least one inferior limb lead. The specificity of the crochetage pattern for the detection of a secundum atrial septal defect was high when present in all three inferior limb leads (greater than 92%). The crochetage pattern in at least one lead in secundum atrial septal defects shows no association with incomplete right bundle branch block (c2(1)=0.80, not significant), and thus these two findings together do not improve the detection of an atrial septal defect. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of the electrocardiographic crochetage patterns in at least one inferior limb lead in echocardiographically proven secundum atrial septal defects are 31.7% and 86.1%, respectively. The electrocardiographic crochetage or notching pattern in inferior limb leads has a high specificity for atrial septal defects in the pediatric population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".