MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936446613 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz018.419

F7. EEG-INDEXED AUDITORY NOVELTY DETECTION DEFICITS IN EARLY-PHASE PSYCHOSIS

2019· article· en· W2936446613 on OpenAlexaff
Hayley Riel, Philip G. Tibbo, Derek J. Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMismatch negativityNoveltyOddball paradigmAudiologyPsychologyElectroencephalographyP3aEvent-related potentialSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Developmental psychologyNeuroscienceMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research has suggested that deficits in auditory novelty detection, measured as mismatch negativity (MMN) and novelty P300, are present in individuals diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia as well as early-phase psychosis (EPP). However, reports of auditory change detection deficits in EPP are inconsistent and need replication. The goal of this study was to further investigate whether MMN and novelty P300 measures deficits exist in an EPP population relative to healthy controls. A total of 17 participants aged 18 to 35 with EPP were recruited from the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program. Twenty-three healthy controls of equivalent age were recruited from the community. Electrophysiological recordings of auditory change detection were measured during the passive presentation of a novelty oddball paradigm. Within the novelty paradigm, standard (P = 0.8) and deviant tones (P = 0.1), in addition to novel environmental sounds (i.e., a dog barking; P = 0.1) were presented. Our endpoints of interest were amplitudes and latencies of the MMN (deviant and novel) and novelty P300 (novel only). The EPP group exhibited reduced novelty MMN amplitudes (p = .05), as well as reduced novelty P300 amplitude (p < .01), relative to healthy controls. Additionally, preliminary analysis of the healthy controls revealed significant sex differences for novelty MMN at frontal and central electrode sites (p < .015; females > males) and novelty P300 at frontal sites (p < .05; females < males). There was an insufficient male:female split in our EPP sample to conduct similar analyses. Overall, our findings support previous reports of reduced MMN in EPP, albeit only to novel environmental sounds. We also corroborate previous findings of reduced novelty P300 in this population. Preliminary analysis of our healthy controls revealed sex differences for both MMN and novelty P300. Future work should whether these sex differences in electrocortical function extend to disorders of psychosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207