Investigation of the pathogenic <i>RFC1</i> repeat expansion in a Canadian and a Brazilian ataxia cohort: identification of novel conformations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A homozygous pentanucleotide expansion in the RFC1 gene has been shown to be a common cause of late-onset ataxia. In the general population a total of four different repeat conformations have been observed: a wild type sequence AAAAG (11 repeats), and longer expansions of AAAAG, AAAGG and AAGGG sequences. However, in ataxia cases only the AAGGG expansion has been shown to be pathogenic. In this study, we assessed the prevalence and nature of RFC1 repeat expansions in three adult-onset ataxia cohorts: Brazilian (n = 23) and Canadian (n = 26) cases that tested negative for other known ataxia mutations, as well as a cohort of randomly selected Canadian cases (n = 128) without regard to a genetic diagnosis. We identified the homozygous AAGGG pathogenic expansion in only one Brazilian family with two affected siblings, and in one Canadian case. The RFC1 expansion may therefore not be a common cause of adult-onset ataxia in these populations. Interestingly we observed two new repeat motifs, AAGAG and AGAGG, which indicates the dynamic nature of the pentanucleotide expansion sequence. To assess the frequency of these two new repeat conformations in the general population we screened 163 healthy individuals. These novel motifs were more frequent in patients versus controls. While we cannot be certain that the homozygous genotypes of the novel expanded conformations are pathogenic, their occurrence should nonetheless be taken into consideration in future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".