Les stratégies financières d’Alcan de 1940 à 1970 : du soutien public aux investissements privés
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après bien des années à satisfaire les commandes militaires, Alcan s’est lancé plus systématiquement dans la transformation de l’aluminium après 1955. Ce faisant, le groupe a dû changer ses stratégies financières. Nul doute qu’après 1940 il n’a pas eu de soucis pour assurer ses investissements. Avec l’aide gouvernementale et la collaboration des milieux financiers nord-américains et britanniques, le groupe canadien a pu accroître ses immobilisations minières et électrolytiques. Dans le secteur de la transformation, cependant, il a dû porter plus d’attention au contrôle du capital de ses filiales, de même qu’aux actifs circulants. L’autofinancement était moins volumineux que dans le primaire, si bien que le groupe en a ressenti un malaise dès les années 1960, malaise qui l’a poussé à s’éloigner graduellement de la transformation. Était-ce pour le mieux ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".