The influence of indigestible protein on the performance and meat quality of broilers vaccinated for coccidiosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High dietary protein and the use of poorly digested protein sources have been suggested to negatively impact broiler health, possibly because of protein fermentation in the distal intestinal tract. The effect of dietary protein levels with low or high indigestible protein fractions (LIP or HIP) on male and female broiler performance were evaluated. The trial was completely randomized with a 2 × 3 × 2 factorial arrangement, where gender, dietary protein levels (24, 26, and 28%), and dietary protein digestible fractions were the main factors. Ross 308 male (1944) and female (2232) were allocated to 72 pens with 54 males or 62 females per pen. Six grower diets 24-LIP, 24-HIP, 26-LIP, 26-HIP, 28-LIP, and 28-HIP were fed from 0 to 32 D of age. Birds were vaccinated with Coccivac-B52 on day 5, and feed intake and BW were recorded on 0, 12, 22, and 32 D. On day 32, 24 birds per treatment were processed for meat yield. Males were heavier than females at all post-hatch ages and the LIP birds were heavier than their HIP counterparts on 32 D. On day 22, birds fed 24 and 26% CP were heavier than those fed 28% CP. Birds fed the 28-LIP diet consumed less total feed than their 24 and 26-LIP equivalents. Birds fed 24% CP had the highest total feed to gain ratio, whereas LIP fed birds had a lower total feed to gain than those fed HIP diets. LIP diets resulted in higher total mortality than the HIP diets. Carcass yield was higher for females than males, increased with CP level, and was lower in HIP than LIP birds. An interaction between CP level and protein digestibility resulted in the 26 and 28-LIP having higher breast yield than all other diets. In conclusion, broiler growth performance and meat yield were affected by dietary indigestible protein alone or in combination with gender and dietary CP level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".