MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936656404 · doi:10.1111/febs.14840

Rev1 plays central roles in mammalian DNA‐damage tolerance in response to UV irradiation

2019· article· en· W2936656404 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohong Niu, Wangyang Chen, Tonghui Bi, Mengxue Lu, Zhoushuai Qin, Wei Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaCapital Normal University
KeywordsDNA damageProliferating cell nuclear antigenCell biologyBiologyUbiquitinDNA polymeraseDNADNA repairProtein subunitGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rev1, a Y-family DNA polymerase, is involved in the tolerance of DNA damage by translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Previous studies have shown that the C-terminal domain (CTD) and ubiquitin (Ub)-binding (UBM) domains of Rev1 play important roles in UV-damage tolerance, but how these domains contribute to the process remains unclear. In this study, we created Ub mutations in a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-Ub fusion that differentially affect its interaction with Rev1 and Polη and found that UV-damage tolerance depends on its interaction with Rev1 but not Polη. We also created Rev1-UBM mutations altering its interaction with a PCNA-Ub fusion and Rev1-CTD mutations affecting its interaction with Polη and the Rev7 subunit of Polζ. We thus demonstrated that elevated expression of Rev1 alone is sufficient to confer enhanced UV-damage tolerance and that this tolerance depends on its physical interaction with monoubiquitinated PCNA and Polζ but is independent of Polη. Collectively, these studies reveal central roles played by Rev1 in coordinating UV-damage response pathway choice in mammalian cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207