Rev1 plays central roles in mammalian DNA‐damage tolerance in response to UV irradiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rev1, a Y-family DNA polymerase, is involved in the tolerance of DNA damage by translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Previous studies have shown that the C-terminal domain (CTD) and ubiquitin (Ub)-binding (UBM) domains of Rev1 play important roles in UV-damage tolerance, but how these domains contribute to the process remains unclear. In this study, we created Ub mutations in a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-Ub fusion that differentially affect its interaction with Rev1 and Polη and found that UV-damage tolerance depends on its interaction with Rev1 but not Polη. We also created Rev1-UBM mutations altering its interaction with a PCNA-Ub fusion and Rev1-CTD mutations affecting its interaction with Polη and the Rev7 subunit of Polζ. We thus demonstrated that elevated expression of Rev1 alone is sufficient to confer enhanced UV-damage tolerance and that this tolerance depends on its physical interaction with monoubiquitinated PCNA and Polζ but is independent of Polη. Collectively, these studies reveal central roles played by Rev1 in coordinating UV-damage response pathway choice in mammalian cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".