MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937001531 · doi:10.1530/biosciprocs.2.015

Follicle selection in domestic ruminants

2019· article· en· W2937001531 on OpenAlexaff
JE Fortune, Jean Sirois, AM Turzillo, M. C. Lavoir

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscientifica Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsFollicular phaseLuteal phaseFollicleOvulationBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyAndrologyHormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound imaging has shown that cattle exhibit 2 or 3 waves of follicular development during an oestrous cycle.The waves consist of the contemporaneous appearance, about every 7 days, of a group of follicles > 5 mm in diameter.One follicle gradually becomes larger than the rest (i.e.dominant).There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the waves occur regularly under conditions of basal LH and FSH.(1) Cycles with 3 waves of follicular development are longer and have longer luteal phases than do cycles with 2 waves, indicating that the number of waves in a cycle is determined by the time of luteal regression.(2) Cycles with 4 or 5 waves of follicular development can occur when the luteal phase is artificially prolonged with exogenous progesterone.(3) Waves of follicular development occur during pregnancy.However, the secondary surge of FSH may be important in initiating new follicular recruitment after ovulation, since suppression of the secondary surge delays the first wave of follicular development.Follicles are functionally dominant (capable of ovulating after luteal regression) while they are still growing and early during their plateau in growth.Functional dominance is lost some time between the early and late plateau phases, while the follicle is still morphologically dominant (i.e. the largest follicle).The factors that lead to dominance of one follicle and the mechanisms that suppress the growth of subordinate follicles are not well understood.When the luteal phase is artificially extended with low doses of exogenous progesterone, the normal pattern of follicular development is altered and the ovulatory follicle grows for a prolonged period of time.This finding indicates that subtle changes in the hormonal milieu can dramatically alter follicular dynamics and that the experimental model of prolonged dominance may be useful in studying the mechanisms of follicular dominance.In contrast, patterns of follicular development in sheep must be assessed in more indirect ways, but sheep offer the advantage of breeds that differ in ovulation rate.Correlation of the endocrine environment with ovulation rate in this species provides a valuable approach to understanding the mechanisms controlling follicle selection and ovulation rate.It has been suggested that in some species a high ovulation rate is achieved by increased recruitment, whereas in others there is increased selection.There is evidence that oestradiol is involved in regulating the number of dominant follicles in sheep.Follicular recruitment requires the presence of gonadotrophins, particularly FSH.In general, the mechanisms that regulate follicular selection and dominance in domestic ruminants are not well understood.Further experiments may determine the relative roles of paracrine factors and ovarian-pituitary-hypothalamic interactions in regulation of follicular selection and dominance in cattle and sheep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscientifica ProceedingsSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207