MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

NPY<sub>2</sub> Receptors Reduce Tonic Action Potential-Independent GABA<sub>B</sub> Currents in the Basolateral Amygdala

2019· article· en· W2937012687 on OpenAlexafffund
James P. Mackay, Maria Bompolaki, M. Regina DeJoseph, Sheldon D. Michaelson, Janice H. Urban, William F. Colmers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesNational Institute of Mental HealthFondation pour la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsBasolateral amygdalaChemistryReceptorAgonistEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiophysicsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although NPY has potent anxiolytic actions within the BLA, selective activation of BLA NPY Y2 receptors (Y2Rs) acutely increases anxiety by an unknown mechanism. Using ex vivo male rat brain slice electrophysiology, we show that the selective Y2R agonist, [ahx5–24]NPY, reduced the frequency of GABAA-mediated mIPSCs in BLA principal neurons (PNs). [ahx5–24]NPY also reduced tonic activation of GABAB receptors (GABABR), which increased PN excitability through inhibition of a tonic, inwardly rectifying potassium current (KIR). Surprisingly, Y2R-sensitive GABABR currents were action potential-independent, persisting after treatment with TTX. Additionally, the Ca2+-dependent, slow afterhyperpolarizing K+ current (IsAHP) was enhanced in approximately half of the Y2R-sensitive PNs, possibly from enhanced Ca2+ influx, permitted by reduced GABABR tone. In male and female mice expressing tdTomato in Y2R-mRNA cells (tdT-Y2R mice), immunohistochemistry revealed that BLA somatostatin interneurons express Y2Rs, as do a significant subset of BLA PNs. In tdT-Y2R mice, [ahx5–24]NPY increased excitability and suppressed the KIR in nearly all BLA PNs independent of tdT-Y2R fluorescence, consistent with presynaptic Y2Rs on somatostatin interneurons mediating the above effects. However, only tdT-Y2R-expressing PNs responded to [ahx5–24]NPY with an enhancement of the IsAHP. Ultimately, increased PN excitability via acute Y2R activation likely correlates with enhanced BLA output, consistent with reported Y2R-mediated anxiogenesis. Furthermore, we demonstrate the following: (1) a novel mechanism whereby activity-independent GABA release can powerfully dampen BLA neuronal excitability via postsynaptic GABABRs; and (2) that this tonic inhibition can be interrupted by neuromodulation, here by NPY via Y2Rs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Within the BLA, NPY is potently anxiolytic. However, selective activation of NPY2 receptors (Y2Rs) increases anxiety by an unknown mechanism. We show that activation of BLA Y2Rs decreases tonic GABA release onto BLA principal neurons, probably from Y2R-expressing somatostatin interneurons, some of which coexpress NPY. This increases principal neuron excitability by reducing GABAB receptor (GABABR)-mediated activation of G-protein-coupled, inwardly rectifying K+ currents. Tonic, Y2R-sensitive GABABR currents unexpectedly persisted in the absence of action potential firing, revealing, to our knowledge, the first report of substantial, activity-independent GABABR activation. Ultimately, we provide a plausible explanation for Y2R-mediated anxiogenesis in vivo and describe a novel and modulatable means of damping neuronal excitability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→