INTRANASAL ADMINISTRATION OF MIDAZOLAM HYDROCHLORIDE IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN FEMALE SURF SCOTERS (MELANITTA PERSPICILLATA) SURGICALLY IMPLANTED WITH INTRACOELOMIC TRANSMITTERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intracoelomic implantation of satellite transmitters is associated with lower survival in surf scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) compared with other species of diving ducks, potentially due to physiologic alterations following physical exertion and stress caused by handling and confinement. The effect of intranasal administration of midazolam hydrochloride on survival of surf scoters surgically implanted with intracelomic transmitters was evaluated. Shortly after their capture in Forestville (QC, Canada) in the fall of 2013, 26 randomly selected adult female surf scoters were administered midazolam hydrochloride (4.6–5.9 mg/kg) intranasally. The same volume of saline (1 mL) was given to another 26 adult female surf scoters as a control group. All birds were surgically implanted with an intracoelomic transmitter equipped with a percutaneous antenna. Transmitters were programmed to transmit 2 hr each day for 30 days after implantation, and mortality was estimated for each group using the telemetry data. The association between the administration of midazolam and survival was assessed while controlling for other factors such as body mass, transmitter-mass-to-body-mass ratio, hematocrit, total solids, and duration of surgery, anesthesia, and confinement. The odds of presumed death in the saline group were 5.3 times higher than in the midazolam group (95% confidence interval: 1.7, 19.0; P = 0.004). The presumed mortality at 30 days for the midazolam group (23%) was lower than for the saline group (61%). No other variable was significantly associated with survival. These results suggest that sedation with midazolam shortly after capture increased the postsurgical survival of female surf scoters surgically implanted with intracoelomic transmitters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".