Highly elliptical orbits for polar regions with reduced total ionizing dose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study reports results of analysis related to minimization of the total ionizing dose (TID) for the Multiple Apogee Highly Elliptical Orbit with periods 14 h, 15 h and 16 h introduced earlier for continuous observation of the Earth’s polar regions. The modeling of space environment has been conducted with use of the European Space Agency’s SPENVIS tool based on the AE8/AP8 radiation models. Originally, the set of orbital parameters has been derived through the optimization process that included among other factors criteria for the apogee height limit and minimization of the radiation dose caused by trapped protons. By relaxing the apogee altitude limit, this study found the total ionizing dose TID can be significantly reduced for 15-h and 16-h orbits, while the originally proposed 14-h orbit is already at the minimum of radiation dose. For 15-h and 16-h orbits this converts into reduction of the thickness of aluminum shielding by factor 1.24–1.28 or an equivalent increase in the mission lifetime by up to 8.1 years. For example, an increase in apogee altitude to 49,620 km for 16-h orbit (eccentricity e = 0.74) in comparison to the originally proposed 16-h orbit (altitude equal to 43,500 km, e = 0.55) reduces the TID so that the shielding thickness decreases to 3.53 mm, instead of 4.35 mm of aluminum slab for the same 15-year duration of mission. Decrease of the TID is achieved due to significant reduction of ionizing radiation from the trapped electrons through the better placing of the orbit trajectory in the slot area, but at the expense of slight increase of ionizing radiation from the trapped protons and increase in apogee altitude to 46,640 km and 49,620 km for 15-h and 16-h orbit, correspondingly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".