Design and analysis of a millimetre‐wave high gain antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A broadband and high gain transmit array (TA) antenna, operating at 60 GHz, is proposed. To meet the design requirements of a TA antenna with polarisation‐insensitive radiation performance, an optimal multi‐layer unit cell (UC) is introduced. The dimensions of the UC are parametrically expressed to realise a linear transmission phase response with a variation range of 270° and insertion loss <−3 dB over the desired frequency band ranging from 58 to 64 GHz. A new planar array composed of 2 × 4 aperture‐coupled‐patches interleaved with a soft‐surface is also designed as a feed for the proposed TA. Furthermore, a hybrid method based on full‐wave simulations and analytical formulations is developed to calculate the radiation characteristics of the TA antenna and the results are compared to the ones achieved with full‐wave simulations. The designed TA antenna is fabricated and the measurement results are presented. The obtained results show peak aperture efficiencies of 38.48% (30.85 dB peak gain) and 32.37% (30.1 dB peak gain), and −1 dB gain bandwidths of 7.7 and 8.2% from the full‐wave simulations and measurements, respectively. Such a broadband and high gain antenna is deemed to be suitable for mm‐wave backhaul links in 5G cellular systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".