MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S100A4 signaling in thyroid cancer

2013· article· en· W2937777351 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manoj Reddy Medapati, Mathias Dahlmann, Stein Ulrike, Saeid Ghavami, Sabine Hombach‐Klonisch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRage (emotion)Cancer researchMetastasisMAPK/ERK pathwaySignal transductionApoptosisMedicineInternal medicineCell biologyBiologyChemistryEndocrinologyCancerNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyroid cancer (TC) is one of the most frequently occurring cancers of endocrine glands in Canada and the United States. Most differentiated TC are curable, but some TCs develop a more aggressive phenotype with resulting metastasis and treatment failures. Our group has shown that relaxin‐like peptides promote TC cell tumor growth and migration, in part mediated via S100A4 which is known to promote metastasis and to confer poor prognosis in patients with TC. Several S100 proteins signal via receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). This study investigates S100A4 signaling in promoting TC cell survival, growth and metastasis. TC cells were stimulated with S100A4 to determine cell motility, proliferation and apoptosis and to identify S100A4‐induced signaling pathways. Using PCR and immunohistochemistry expression of RAGE was detected in TC cells and in TC tissues, but not in normal thyroid tissues. RAGE pull‐down experiments demonstrated S100A4 to bind to RAGE in TC. ERK and JNK/SAPK signaling pathways were activated in TC cells upon S100A4 stimulation. We used RAGE blocking antibodies and diaphanous‐1 knock‐down to prevent RAGE‐mediated S100A4‐signaling in TC. S100A4‐induced ERK‐signaling appeared to be independent of RAGE in TC. We identified TLR4 expression in TC cells and demonstrate here that the effects of S100A4 are, in part, mediated via TLR4 in TC. This research is funded by NSERC of Canada and Dept of surgery research fund. Grant Funding Source : n/a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207