MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938016654 · doi:10.32832/abdidos.v2i3.194

PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PEMBERDAYAAN GURU DAN MASYARAKAT UNTUK MEMINIMALISIR TERJADINYA KENAKALAN REMAJA DI DESA CIASIHAN

2018· article· id· W2938016654 on OpenAlexaff
Safaruddin Hidayat, Achmad Reza

Bibliographic record

VenueAbdi Dosen Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Justice Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desa Ciasihan adalah desa yang diapit oleh dua sungai terkenal yaitu sungai Cikuluwung dan sungai Ciasmara. Desa Ciasihan mempunyai luas wilayah 665,274 Ha, terbagi 3 Dusun, yaitu: Dusun I, Dusun II, Dusun III, dan terdiri dari 9 RW dan 52 RT, dengan jumlah penduduk sebanyak 10.536 jiwa, laki-laki 5462 jiwa dan perempuan sebanyak 5074 jiwa dari (2785 Kepala Keluarga). Banyaknya jumlah penduduk keluarga di desa Ciasihan ini, tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa kenakalan remaja akan merajalela ke setiap desa. Perilaku menyimpang kenakalan remaja adalah suatu perbuatan yang melanggar norma, aturan, atau hukum dalam masyarakat yang dilakukan pada usia remaja atau transisi masa anak-anak ke dewasa. Kenakalan remaja merupakan kumpulan dari berbagai perilaku remaja yang tidak dapat diterima secara sosial hingga terjadi tindakan kriminal. Pada saat ini peran keluarga, guru, masyarakat serta lingkunganlah yang menjadi pondasi dan dapat membentengi agar meminimalisir terjadinya kenakalan remaja. Berpartisipasi dalam acara seminar “Mendidik anak zaman now dalam mengatasi kenakalan remaja” merupakan salah satu upaya untuk meminimalisir terjadinya kenakalan remaja di Desa ciasihan Kecamatan Pamijahan, Kabupaten Bogor

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbdi Dosen Jurnal Pengabdian Pada MasyarakatSame topicLegal and Social Justice StudiesFrench-language works237,207