Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A temporal linear stability analysis of laminar flow in weakly eccentric annular channels has been performed. It has been shown that, even for eccentricities ε and Reynolds numbers that were much smaller than those considered in previous studies, flow instability occurred in the form of travelling waves having characteristics that are very different from those of Tollmien-Schlichting waves and which were triggered at mid-gap by an inviscid mechanism that is associated with the presence of inflection points in azimuthal profiles of the base velocity. The critical stability conditions have been determined for 0 ≤ ε ≤ 0.1 and for diameter ratios 0 < γ < 1. The critical Reynolds number Rec decreased with increasing γ for 0 < γ ≲ 0.13, reached a minimum at γ ≈ 0.13, and increased with further increase in γ. The lowest observed Rec was 529 and occurred for ε = 0.1 and γ ≈ 0.13. As ε → 0, Rec ∝ ε−2. The critical wave number and the critical frequency of the disturbances decreased with increasing γ and approached zero as γ → 1, whilst their ratio was nearly constant in the range of parameters considered in this study. The most unstable regions were found to be at roughly mid-gap on the two flanks of the annulus, and the phase speed of the disturbances was close to the base flow velocity at these regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it