MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938429240 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.034

Update of the statements on biology and clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection

2019· review· en· W2938429240 on OpenAlexaff
Giovanni Raimondo, Stephen Locarnini, Teresa Pollicino, Massimo Levrero, Fabien Zoulim, Anna S. Lok, Jean‐Pierre Allain, Thomas Berg, Antonio Bertoletti, Maurizia Rossana Brunetto, Raffaele Bruno, Ding‐Shinn Chen, Nicola Coppola, Markus Cornberg, Antonio Craxı̀, Maura Dandri, V. Di Marco, Carlo Ferrari, Giovanni Battista Gaeta, Dieter Glebe, Luca G. Guidotti, Anna Kramvis, Pietro Lampertico, Chengyao Li, Jake T. Liang, Alfredo Marzano, T.I. Michalak, Jean–Michel Pawlotsky, Daniele Prati, Massimo Puoti, Didier Samuel, Vincent Soriano, Giovanni Squadrito, Camille Sureau, Christian Trépo, Man‐Fung Yuen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hepatology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesSouthern Medical UniversityInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleNational Taiwan UniversityInstitut National de la Transfusion SanguineUniversità degli Studi di MessinaMedizinischen Hochschule HannoverUniversità degli Studi di ParmaUniversidad Internacional de La RiojaWorld Health OrganizationUniversità degli Studi di PaviaUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfNational Institutes of HealthRegione CampaniaFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
KeywordsOccultVirologyHepatitis B virusMedicineVirusImmunologyBiologyPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In October 2018 a large number of international experts with complementary expertise came together in Taormina to participate in a workshop on occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI). The objectives of the workshop were to review the existing knowledge on OBI, to identify issues that require further investigation, to highlight both existing controversies and newly emerging perspectives, and ultimately to update the statements previously agreed in 2008. This paper represents the output from the workshop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations549
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HepatologySame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207