Teacher Development in Higher Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. What We Know and Fail to Know About the Impact of Teacher Development Gabriela Pleschova and Eszter Simon Part One: Training for What? Instructional Development for Graduate Students 2. Preparing Doctoral Students for a Teaching Career: The Case of an International University with a History of Regional Engagement Joanna Renc-Roe and Tatiana Yarkova 3. Graduate Student Teacher Training Courses, Job Placement, and Teaching Awards in the United States John Ishiyama, Alexandra Cole, Angela D. Nichols, Kerstin Hamann and Kimberly Mealy 4. The Impact of Training on Teacher Effectiveness: Canadian Practices and Policies Christopher Knapper Part Two: Using Program Assessments to Improve Program Design 5. Mentorship in Teacher Training: A Preliminary Review of a Professional Development Programme for Tertiary Teachers in Singapore Huang Hoon Chng and Alan Soong Swee Kit 6. Combining International Experience with the Local Context: Designing and Improving Instructional Development in a Post-Soviet Setting Mari Karm, Marvi Remmik and Anu Haamer 7. Institutional Factors in Re-Designing an Accredited Continuing Professional Development Course in Northern Ireland Vicky Davies and Sarah Maguire Part Three: Top-Down Determinants of Success in Instructional Development Programs 8. The Emerging European Higher Education Area: Implications for Instructional Development Kathleen M. Quinlan and Erkki Berndtson 9. Teacher Development Programmes: National Policies Enabling Local Impact in Ireland Jennifer Murphy 10. The Influence of the Research Philosophy and Pedagogical Management Decisions of the University of Helsinki on University Teaching: A Longitudinal Study Anne Nevgi 11. The Impact of UK University Teaching Programmes on Lecturers' Assessment Practice: A Case for Pedagogical Action Research Lin S. Norton, Bill Norton and Lee Shannon Part Four: Theorizing About Instructional Development 12. How Effects from Teacher Training of Academic Teachers Propagate into the Meso Level and Beyond Torgny Roxa and Katarina Martensson 13. Instructional Development for University Teachers: Causes of Impact and Practical Implications Ann Stes and Peter Van Petegem 14. Evaluating the Impact of University Teaching Development Programmes: Methodologies That Ask Why There Is an Impact Keith Trigwell 15. Creating Successful Teacher Development Programmes Eszter Simon and Gabriela Pleschova
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".