Systematic preparation and processing of interferometric synthetic aperture radar data for monitoring linear transportation infrastructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a methodology for the systematic preparation and processing of interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data for monitoring linear transportation infrastructure subject to geohazards. The methodology is applied to two RADARSAT-2 Spotlight synthetic aperture radar datasets, and three case studies in Cornwall, Eastern Ontario, Canada, are examined. An InSAR processing sequence was established and 19 SLA24 and 15 SLA74 images were used to create time-series deformation maps spanning from March 2015 to September 2016. The noise floors were ±1.5 and ±1.0 cm, for the SLA24 and SLA74 datasets, respectively. Phase unwrapping errors, atmospheric path delay, and the limited number of images were identified as the largest contributors to measurement uncertainty, which was of the same order as the ground deformation field. To improve coherence and utility of the radar images for monitoring the effects of geohazards on infrastructure, it is recommended that imagery acquisitions consider the use of small incidence angles with moderate image resolution and 6- to 12-day revisit periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".