MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938913601 · doi:10.1002/mrm.27765

Accelerated interleaved spiral‐IDEAL imaging of hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe for parametric gas exchange mapping in humans

2019· article· en· W2938913601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsSpiral (railway)XenonHematocritChemistryVoxelParametric statisticsNuclear medicineNuclear magnetic resonanceAccelerationBiomedical engineeringPhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMedicineMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of mapping gas exchange with single breath‐hold hyperpolarized (HP) 129 Xe in humans, acquiring parametric maps of lung physiology. The potential benefit of acceleration using parallel imaging for this application is also explored. Methods Six healthy volunteers were scanned with a modified spiral‐IDEAL sequence to acquire gas exchange‐weighted images using a single dose of 129 Xe. These images were fit with the model of xenon exchange (MOXE) on a voxel‐wise basis calculating parametric maps of lung physiology, specifically: air–capillary barrier thickness (δ), alveolar septal thickness ( d ), capillary transit time ( t x ), pulmonary hematocrit (HCT), and alveolar surface area‐to‐volume ratio (SVR). An accelerated version of the sequence was also tested in subset of 4 volunteers and compared to the fully sampled (FS) results. Results Mean image‐wide values calculated from MOXE parametric maps derived from FS dissolved 129 Xe spiral‐IDEAL images were: δ = 0.89 ± 0.17 μm, d = 7.5 ± 0.5 μm, t x = 1.1 ± 0.2s, HCT = 28.8 ± 2.3%, and SVR = 140 ± 16 cm −1 , in good agreement with previously published values based on whole‐lung spectroscopy of healthy human subjects. Parallel imaging sufficiently reduces artifacting in accelerated images, but increases disagreement with MOXE parameters derived from FS data with mean voxel‐wise unsigned relative differences of: δ = 39 ± 9%, d = 22 ± 3%, t x = 117 ± 43%, HCT = 11 ± 2%, and SVR = 31 ± 12%. Conclusion Dissolved HP 129 Xe spiral‐IDEAL imaging for gas exchange mapping is feasible in humans using a single breath‐hold. Accelerated gas exchange mapping is also shown to be feasible but requires further improvements to increase quantitative accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it