MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938980179 · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2019.01.021

Neuroimaging Evidence for Right Orbitofrontal Cortex Differences in Adolescents With Emotional and Behavioral Dysregulation

2019· article· en· W2938980179 on OpenAlexaff
Philip A. Spechler, Bader Chaarani, Catherine Orr, Scott Mackey, Stephen T. Higgins, Tobias Banaschewski, Arun L.W. Bokde, Uli Bromberg, Christian Büchel, Erin Burke Quinlan, Patricia Conrod, Sylvane Desrivières, Herta Flor, Vincent Frouin, Penny Gowland, Andreas Heinz, Bernd Ittermann, Jean‐Luc Martinot, Frauke Nees, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Luise Poustka, Juliane H. Fröhner, Michael N. Smolka, Henrik Walter, Robert Whelan, Günter Schumann, Hugh Garavan, Robert R. Althoff, Gareth J. Barker, Marie‐Laure Paillère Martinot, Éric Artiges, Hervé Lemaître, Tomáš Paus, Nora C. Vetter, Sarah Jurk, Eva Mennigen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringHorizon 2020Medical Research CouncilNational Institute of Mental HealthVetenskapsrådetFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheMission Interministérielle de Lutte Contre les Drogues et les Conduites AddictivesEli Lilly and CompanyScience Foundation IrelandEuropean CommissionNational Institute of General Medical SciencesFondation de FranceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustNational Institutes of HealthFondation de l'Avenir pour la Recherche Médicale AppliquéeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftKing's College London
KeywordsOrbitofrontal cortexNeuroimagingPsychologyEmotional dysregulationClinical psychologyNeurosciencePrefrontal cortexCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent PsychiatrySame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207