MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939018795 · doi:10.20473/cmsnj.v6i2.12829

EKSTRAK LIDAH BUAYA TOPIKAL MEMBERIKAN PENGARUH PADA KONSISTENSI SKAR HIPERTROFIK PASKA LUKA BAKAR

2018· article· id· W2939018795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAloe veraHypertrophic scarDermatologyMuscle contractureScarsKeloidSurgeryPopulationPhotoagingTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Post-traumatic burns that already heal, very often happens that an ugly scar in the form of hypertrophic scarring, keloids and are often accompanied by the presence of contractures. Hypertrophic and keloid scar is fibroproliferation abnormalities in the dermis that is unique to humans that may arise as a result of burns. While contractures occur because of the shortening of the pathological scarring that causes deformities and movement disorders such as the limited movement of a body part. cases of burns caused 195,000 deaths/year worldwide, especially in poor and developing countries. This aim of this study was to analyze the effect of topical aloe extract against consistency, height, and pigmentation scarring after burns hypertrophic Poly Plastic Surgeon Dr. Soetomo. Methods: This research was used in the pre-experimental design. The population was all patients with burns and 10 patient samples. It used consecutive sampling. The independent variable was aloe vera topical and the dependent variable was the quality of the hypertrophic scar. Data were collected using the Vancouver Scar Scale and then analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks and Paired T-Test. Result: The results showed that there was significant effect before and after basting of topical aloe vera on the value of consistency (p=0.005). No significant effect before and after the aloe vera in the pigmentation scores (p=0.317) and height. There was a difference significant hypertrophic scar consistency before and after aloe vera extract. No differences in height and pigmentation significant hypertrophic scars before and after extract of aloe vera extract topical effect on the consistency, but not in height and pigmentation in hypertrophic scarring after burns. Conclusions: Further studies with more samples to determine the substances contained in aloe vera that can accelerate changes in consistency, pigmentation, and height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0120.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it