MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2939050383 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215018

Absence of p21(WAF1/CIP1/SDI1) protects against osteopenia and minimizes bone loss after ovariectomy in a mouse model

2019· article· en· W2939050383 on OpenAlexafffund
Priyatha Premnath, Leah Ferrie, Dante Louie, Steven K. Boyd, Roman Krawetz

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsOsteopeniaOsteoclastBone resorptionEndocrinologyBone remodelingOsteoporosisProgenitor cellInternal medicineOsteoblastBone marrowKnockout mouseCell biologyCell growthProgenitorAnabolismChemistryBiologyStem cellMedicineBone mineralReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

p21(WAF1/CIP1/SDI1) is a critical sentinel of the cell cycle that plays an important role in determining cell fate with respect to proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that inhibition/loss of p21 promotes osteo-chondro differentiation in progenitor/stem cells, and that p21 knockout (p21-/-) mice demonstrate enhanced bone regeneration compared to wild-type controls after a non-critical size defect. It was therefore hypothesized that the absence of p21 may also protect against bone loss through enhancing bone formation, tilting the balance away from bone resorption, in an ovariectomy-induced osteopenia mouse model, investigated via microCT imaging. While p21-/- mice demonstrated significantly less bone loss after ovariectomy compared to wild-type controls, no increase in the number osteoclasts or osteoblasts in the bone or bone marrow was observed, nor was there an increase in osteoclast activity. Therefore, while the absence of p21 protected mice against estrogen mediated bone loss, the mechanisms/pathways responsible remained elusive. This study demonstrates that p21 may play a significant role in bone remodeling, and a better understanding of how the p21 pathway regulates bone anabolism and catabolism could lead to novel therapies for osteoporosis in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→