Efficacy of Non-ablative Laser Therapy for Lichen Sclerosus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser treatment of lichen sclerosus (LS) by comparing it with topical corticosteroid treatment. METHODS: A total of 40 female patients with vulvar LS were randomized 1:1 into a study (laser) group and a control (topical corticosteroids) group. The laser group received three laser treatments. Blinded evaluators evaluated biopsies and graded improvement on clinical photographs at baseline and at 3 months. Patients graded the intensity of symptoms on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Patients also rated the tolerability of laser treatments, and side effects were monitored. (Canadian Task Force classification I) RESULTS: Laser treatment discomfort was on average 1.5 of 10 on the visual analogue scale. At 1- and 3-month follow-up, patients in the laser group had significantly greater improvement in LS symptoms (burning, itching, pain, and dyspareunia), better patient satisfaction, and greater reduction of sclerosis than patients in the topical corticosteroid group. At 6-month follow-up, the improvement of symptoms in the laser group was still significant. The correct order of photographs (before and after treatment) was assigned significantly more often in the laser-treated patients compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Laser therapy for LS caused minimal patient discomfort during the treatment, with no adverse effects, and demonstrated better efficacy than in the control group, with significant improvement lasting up to 6 months. Laser therapy is a promising option for patients not responding to topical corticosteroid therapy or patients wishing to reduce long-term corticosteroid maintenance use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".