MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939767830 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz018.538

F126. IMPACT OF TREATMENT ON CLIENT QUALITY OF LIFE IN A CANADIAN FIRST EPISODE PSYCHOSIS PROGRAM

2019· article· en· W2939767830 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elham Sadeh, Julie Beaulac, S. Robertson, Katharine Gillis

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of life (healthcare)Mental healthPsychologyPsychiatryLongitudinal studyPsychosisMedicineSocializationGerontologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quality of life has become one of the most important components assessing outcomes in first episode psychosis populations as it measures broad aspects of life including satisfaction, functioning, socialization, physical health, and psychological well-being. The main aim of this study was to assess quality of life of clients with first episode psychosis following treatment in a community-based mental health outpatient program specialized in assessment and treatment of early psychosis. The program is based on a recovery model and offers comprehensive treatment for up to 3 years to individuals aged 16 to 35 years residing in North-Eastern Ontario, Canada. The study used a longitudinal approach to evaluate the impact of the treatment on clients’ quality of life one- and two-years following treatment. All patients with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis were included for the period between September 2008 and 2018. Quality of life was assessed through a standardized self-reported Wisconsin Quality of Life (WQoL) questionnaire which measures eight domains including General Satisfaction, Activities and Occupation, Psychological Well-being, Symptoms, Physical Health, Social Relationship and Support, Money, and Activities of Daily Living. The WQoL was completed at three time points: baseline (T0) + 3 months of enrollment, one year (T1), and two years (T2) following start of treatment. In total 394 WQoL questionnaires were completed (T0=150, T1=150, T2= 94). Most patients reported being single (91%), white (60%), and male (65%), with an average age of 25 years (SD=5.5). The majority also reported living with their parents (65%) and having completed high school (74%). Paired or repeated measures analysis indicated a highly significant improvement on all quality of life domains from baseline to one- and two-years post treatment (p<0.001- 0.001); however, only Psychological Well-being domain had a significant mean change from one year to two years following treatment (t(43)=6.2, p<0.001). Client Weighted Quality of Life Index also improved significantly from baseline to one year (t(93)=6.8, p<0.001) and two years post treatment (t(46)=6.2, p<0.001). Clients also reported a higher Quality of Life Index from one year to two years following the treatment (t(62)=2.9, p=0.004). In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that quality of life of patients with first episode psychosis improved significantly in various domains following one and two years of comprehensive medical and psychological treatment in a specialized early intervention program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207