MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940095148

Ultra-high aspect ratio functional nanoporous silicon via nucleated catalysts

2017· article· en· W2940095148 on OpenAlexaff
Jatin J. Patil, Brendan D. Smith, Jeffrey C. Grossman

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoporousSubstrate (aquarium)NanotechnologySiliconPorous siliconOptoelectronics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanoporous silicon (NPSi) has drawn recent interest because of its potential in a range of applications such as battery anodes, photocatalysis, thermoelectrics, and filtration membranes. However, the inexpensive and scalable manufacturing of high aspect ratio porous structures on the nanometer scale has been difficult due to the reliance of current methods on complex and expensive equipment used for techniques such as anodization or photolithography. Here, we report a method of producing NPSi with sub-10 nm pore sizes and aspect ratios as high as 400 : 1 by leveraging the nucleation of sputtered noble metals on the Si surface, followed by metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE). The technique is capable of producing NPSi in an intrinsically scalable manner. Samples are characterized with SEM and TEM, along with vertical and horizontal FIB cross-sectional milling to elucidate the porous structure at several μm of depth within the substrate. Following preparation of the NPSi, it is functionalized with Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 via atomic layer deposition (ALD). TiO 2 -functionalized NPSi exhibits reflectivity of 6-8% for visible wavelengths, and 2-3% in the infrared-showing its promise as a robust and functional porous substrate. The developed approach of employing MACE with sputtered nucleated catalysts facilitates the scalable fabrication of functional ultra-high aspect-ratio nanopores in silicon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Same topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207