MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940256345 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsz067.413

0414 Mood as a Mediator of Mindfulness and Insomnia Symptoms in Young Adults

2019· article· en· W2940256345 on OpenAlexaff
Nyissa A. Walsh, Lily M. Repa, E King, Sheila N. Garland

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMedical Research and Materiel Command
KeywordsMindfulnessInsomniaDistressMediationPsychologyClinical psychologyMoodInternal medicineMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous research suggests that there is an inverse relationship between insomnia severity and mindfulness, but this association may be influenced by mood and gender. The present study examined whether psychological distress mediates the relationship between insomnia severity and mindfulness after adjusting for gender. We surveyed 2,159 young adults aged 18-35. Participants completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Kessler Distress Scale, and the Insomnia Severity Index. Regression analyses were used to investigate whether psychological distress mediates the effect of mindfulness on insomnia severity in young adults after adjusting for gender. The mean age of the sample was 22 years (SD=3.73) and 70.6% identified as female. Overall, insomnia severity was in the mild range (M=8.99, SD=5.61) with 55.4% reporting at least mild insomnia symptoms. Psychological distress was in the mild to moderate range (M=24.31; SD=8.51) with 28.7% of the sample being in the clinically significant range. Mindfulness was a significant predictor of psychological distress (B= -.322, SE=.010, p<.0001) and psychological distress was a significant predictor of insomnia severity (B= .395, SE=.011, p<.0001). Mindfulness was also a significant predictor of insomnia severity (B= -.16, SE=.007, p<.0001). The relationship between mindfulness and insomnia severity decreased after adjusting for psychological distress (B= -.047, SE=.008, p<.0001), consistent with partial mediation. Approximately 38.9% of insomnia severity was accounted for by the predictors (R2=.389). A Sobel test confirmed the significance of the mediation (Z= -19.96, SE= .0057, p<.0001). Mindfulness was associated with approximately .11 points higher insomnia severity scores as mediated by psychological distress. There was a significant difference in psychological distress scores between gender [F(1,2187)=25.616, p<.0001], with females reporting greater levels of psychological distress (M=14.79, SE=.21) than males (M=12.72, SE=.36) but gender did not impact the relationship between insomnia, mood, and mindfulness. Psychological distress partially accounts for the relationship between mindfulness and insomnia severity among young adults and this effect does not differ by gender. These results suggest that mindfulness training may have a positive impact on insomnia severity through a reduction in psychological distress. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207