MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940256898 · doi:10.1017/cts.2017.236

2493

2017· article· en· W2940256898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian D. Berman, Erika Shelton, Yubin Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical and Translational Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystoniaCervical dystoniaFlumazenilFocal dystoniaBotulinum toxinPopulationSpasmodic TorticollisNeurosciencePsychologyInternal medicineGABAA receptorMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Determine whether GABA-A receptor binding is abnormal and linked to dystonia symptoms in cervical dystonia (CD). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: There is increasing evidence that a key pathophysiological mechanism in adult-onset focal dystonia is a reduction in inhibitory control over the sensorimotor network. Results from a recent 11C-flumazenil PET imaging study suggest that abnormal inhibitory signaling in genetic and sporadic forms of dystonia may be due to reduced GABA-A binding. It remains unknown whether CD, the most common form of adult-onset focal dystonia, is associated with abnormal GABA-A binding. The goal of this research is to determine if GABA-A receptor binding is abnormal and linked to dystonia symptoms in CD. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We investigated whole brain GABA-A binding in 15 CD patients (11F; 64±8 y) and 15 healthy controls (10F; 64±9 y) using 60-minute dynamic 11C-flumazenil PET scans. GABA-A receptor binding potential (BP) was estimated using a simplified reference tissue model. A 2-sample t-test was used to identify voxel-wise GABA-A BP differences between groups, and a regression analysis used to test for correlations between GABA-A BP and disease severity as measured with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). A conventional region of interest analysis was also conducted to quantify BP changes within the sensorimotor network using the automated anatomical labeling atlas. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: CD patients have reduced GABA-A receptor binding compared with healthy controls, with the greatest reduction seen within the sensorimotor region of the thalamus. Furthermore, reductions in GABA-A binding in brain regions associated with coupling sensory and motor information predict motor severity. These findings support that reduced GABAergic signaling within sensorimotor integration regions is a key mechanism underlying dystonic symptoms in CD and could help inform the development of better, more targeted treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7180.614

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical and Translational ScienceSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207