MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940317257 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsz067.776

0778 Maternal Anxiety and its Association with Perceptions of Infant Sleep-Related Behaviours

2019· article· en· W2940317257 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Burdayron, Christine Laganière, Bryan Butler, Karine Dubois‐Comtois, Marie‐Julie Béliveau, Marie‐Hélène Pennestri

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedtimeAnxietyCryingPsychologySleep (system call)Association (psychology)Trait anxietyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perinatal studies have shown a robust association between increased maternal sleep deprivation and increased maternal depressive symptoms. However, studies examining the link between maternal anxiety and sleep in new mothers are scarce and have yielded mixed results. One recent study found that anxious mothers were more likely to misinterpret their infant’s crying and feeding behaviours. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the associations between maternal anxiety and perceptions of infant sleep-related behaviours. Mothers (n = 38) at 6 months post-partum completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Sleep Practices Questionnaire (SPQ). SPQ items were used to determine the degree to which mothers perceived their infant’s sleep-related behaviours as problematic (1: not at all to 5: definitely). Items included: 1) “How much of a problem for you are your baby's night wakings?”, 2) “Overall, how much of a problem is it for you to put your baby to sleep at bedtime?”, 3) “How much of a problem for you is it to help your baby learn to sleep through the night?”, and 4) “How much of a problem for your baby is it to learn to sleep through the night?”. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relations between maternal anxiety and maternal perceptions. Mothers with higher levels of anxiety reported that their infant’s nocturnal awakenings were more problematic (r=0.43; p<0.01). They also reported that it was more problematic for them to put their infant to sleep at bedtime (r=0.41; p <0.05), for them to help their infant learn how to sleep through the night (r=0.40; p<0.05), and for their infant to learn how to sleep through the night (r=0.45; p<.01). Findings add to the existing perinatal sleep literature by considering mothers’ perceptions of their infants' sleep-related behaviours in addition to their anxiety. Present results suggest that maternal anxiety is related to the degree to which mothers perceive their infant’s sleep behaviours as problematic. Maternal perceptions should therefore be considered by clinicians when working with new mothers. SSHRC, FRQS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207