Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores the Romantic representation of femininity in relation to elements of \nthe Western esoteric tradition. In particular, it discusses the presence of Gnostic themes \nand gender imagery and the ways in which Romantic writers incorporated these concepts \ninto their works as a means of articulating discourses that could challenge mainstream \ntrends. I propose that Romantic writers engaged with an image of the feminine that \nelevated the female within the epistemological hierarchies of the eighteenth and nineteenth \ncenturies, and whose precedents lie in the traditions of Gnosticism and other esoteric \nschools of thought. This feminine image resurfaced within dissenting movements like the \nMoravians, Behmenists and Swedenborgians, who emphasised the feminine aspects of \nGod and creation. \nDuring the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, these movements, and the \nideas they espoused, became intertwined with apocalyptic concepts which entailed the \nspiritual renewal and the betterment of humanity, and in which the feminine was a central \ncomponent and catalyst. These concepts acquired greater socio-political significance \nduring and post-Revolution and, within this socio-political climate, Romantic writers \nchallenged the binary constructions of gender and epistemological hierarchies. This thesis \ndemonstrates the ways in which Romantic writers—S.T. Coleridge, William Blake, Mary \nShelley, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and the transitional figure, Elizabeth Barrett Browning— \nincorporated alternative religious representations of gender into their writings in ways that \nsubverted established discourse, depicting the feminine as a source of spiritual wisdom and \ncreative transcendence, a mode of representation that mirrors such figures as the Gnostic \nSophia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".