Behaviour of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete beam-column joint under cyclic loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) has very high compressive strength up to 200 MPa and exhibits strain hardening effects under flexural loading. The bond strength between UHPFRC and steel reinforcement is much better than the normal strength concrete. Therefore, there is a potential to use UHPFRC material at the beam-column joint region to reduce the congestion of reinforcement as well as to improve the seismic resistance of the structure. In this pilot study, the beam column joints made of normal strength concrete and UHPFRC were tested under lateral cyclic loading up to failure using a 500 tonne capacity computer control servo hydraulic machine. The specimen with normal strength concrete failed at the joint region while the specimen with UHPFRC material failed due to yielding of the rebars in the beam sections near the column face and no obvious cracks were observed at the joint area. The specimens with UHPFRC as joint material exhibited higher initial lateral stiffness and achieved slightly higher ultimate load capacity than the specimen with normal strength concrete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".