MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 13386: Persistence of Transplanted Explant-derived Human Cardiac Stem Cells Contributes to Therapeutic Regeneration of Injured Mycardium

2015· article· en· W2940446376 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Richardson, Seth Mount, Audrey E. Mayfield, Ghazaleh Rafatian, Nicholas Latham, Duncan J. Stewart, Darryl R. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStem cellPropidium iodideContractilityCardiac function curveRegeneration (biology)Ejection fractionCell therapyCancer researchCell biologyAndrologyPathologyInternal medicineApoptosisBiologyProgrammed cell deathHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cardiac stem cells (CSCs) mediated improvements in cardiac function have been attributed to the rescue of reversibly damaged tissue, proliferation of endogenous cells and differentiation of transplanted CSCs into new myocardium. Despite evidence that CSC therapy improves post-ischemic function, controversy surrounds the extent to which physical incorporation and persistence of transplanted cells contributes to the benefits of CSC therapy. In this study, we use “on demand” ablation of transplanted CSCs to dissect the contribution of engrafted cells to myocardial repair. Methods/Results: Diphtheria toxin (DT) was used to induce transplanted human cell death. Human CSCs were cultured from atrial appendage biopsies obtained during clinically-indicated surgery. Exposure of human CSCs to DT prompted expression of annexin V ± propidium iodide in 37±10% of treated cells within 12 hours (p≤0.05 vs. human CSCs not exposed to DT) and resulted in a progressive decline in viable human cell counts (Figure A); suggesting that DT may provide the ideal means of ablating transplanted human sourced cells within a DT resistant host. The influence of short term persistence of transplanted CSCs was investigated in a series of SCID mice by applying DT or vehicle 1 week after intra-myocardial injection of human CSCs (Figure B). A decline in the ejection fraction in CSC-treated mice underscores the importance of transplanted cell persistence on CSC-mediated cardiac repair. This decrease was paralleled by increases in scar size (1.4±1.0 fold greater % scar, p=0.05), reduced contractility (1.2±0.1 fold lower dP/dT max, p=0.04) and impaired relaxation (1.6±0.2 fold lower dP/dT min, p=0.05) as compared to mice that received CSCs alone. Conclusions: Elimination of CSCs 1 week after transplantation reduces CSC-mediated cardiac repair- suggesting that persistent paracrine secretion and/or cell replacement contribute to the maintenance of therapeutic regeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207