MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940560690 · doi:10.3390/ma12091366

The Tribaloy T-800 Coatings Deposited by Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENSTM)

2019· article· en· W2940560690 on OpenAlexaff
Tomasz Durejko, Magdalena Łazińska, Julita Dworecka-Wójcik, Stanisław Lipiński, Robert A. Varin, Tomasz Czujko

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaves phaseBrittlenessMicrostructureCorrosionSubstrate (aquarium)MetallurgySuperalloyAlloyNear net shapeFracture (geology)LaserComposite materialIntermetallic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Tribaloy family of alloys (CoMoCrSi) are characterized by a substantial resistance to wear and corrosion within a wide range of temperatures. These properties are a direct result of their microstructure including the presence of Laves phase in varying proportions. Tribaloy T-800 exhibits the highest content of Laves phase of all other commercial Tribaloy alloys, which provides high hardness and wear resistance. On the other hand, a large content of the Laves phase brings about a high sensitivity to brittle fracture of this alloy. The main objective of this work was a development of the Tribaloy T-800 coatings on the Ni-based superalloy substrate (RENE 77), which employs a Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENSTM) technique. Technological limitations in this process are susceptibility of T-800 to brittle fracture as well as significant thermal stresses due to rapid cooling, which is an inherent attribute of laser techniques. Therefore, in this work, a number of steps that optimized the LENSTM process and improved the metallurgical soundness of coatings are presented. Employing volume and local substrate pre-heating resulted in the formation of high quality coatings devoid of cracks and flaws.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207