MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940582390 · doi:10.1002/humu.23771

Mutation update for the <i>SATB2</i> gene

2019· review· en· W2940582390 on OpenAlexaff
Yuri A. Zárate, Katherine A. Bosanko, Aislling R. Caffrey, Jonathan A. Bernstein, Donna M. Martin, Marc S. Williams, Elizabeth Berry‐Kravis, Paul R. Mark, Melanie A. Manning, Vikas Bhambhani, Marcelo Alves Vargas, Andrea Seeley, Juvianee Estrada‐Veras, Marieke F. van Dooren, Maria Schwab, Adeline Vanderver, Daniela Melis, Adnan Alsadah, Laurie S. Sadler, Hilde Van Esch, Bert Callewaert, Ann Oostra, Jane MacLean, Maria Lisa Dentici, Valeria Orlando, Mark Lipson, Steven Sparagana, Timothy J. Maarup, Suzanne Alsters, Ariel Brautbar, Eliana Kovitch Thropp, Sakkubai Naidu, Melissa Lees, Douglas M. Smith, Lesley Turner, Víctor Raggio, Lucía Spangenberg, Sixto García‐Miñáur, Elizabeth Roeder, Rebecca O. Littlejohn, Dorothy K. Grange, Jean P. Pfotenhauer, Marilyn C. Jones, Meena Balasubramanian, Antonio Federico Martínez‐Monseny, Lot Snijders Blok, Ralitza Gavrilova, Jennifer L. Fish

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeVlaamse regering
KeywordsBiologyMissense mutationGeneticsPhenotypeGeneExpansiveGenotype-phenotype distinctionGenotypeMutationCoding region

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SATB2-associated syndrome (SAS) is an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder caused by alterations in the SATB2 gene. Here we present a review of published pathogenic variants in the SATB2 gene to date and report 38 novel alterations found in 57 additional previously unreported individuals. Overall, we present a compilation of 120 unique variants identified in 155 unrelated families ranging from single nucleotide coding variants to genomic rearrangements distributed throughout the entire coding region of SATB2. Single nucleotide variants predicted to result in the occurrence of a premature stop codon were the most commonly seen (51/120 = 42.5%) followed by missense variants (31/120 = 25.8%). We review the rather limited functional characterization of pathogenic variants and discuss current understanding of the consequences of the different molecular alterations. We present an expansive phenotypic review along with novel genotype-phenotype correlations. Lastly, we discuss current knowledge of animal models and present future prospects. This review should help provide better guidance for the care of individuals diagnosed with SAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207